The Facebook Papers: Internal Documents leaked, everybody wants to know, this article will provide you with every detail. The federation of media organizations reports revelations from a list of internal documents is leaked from Facebook.
Most of the company’s documents have been submitted to Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the media organization by lawyers representing Facebook spokeswoman Frances Haugen.
He recently testified before Congress about the problems and policies that plagued him on the social media platform and lodged at least eight complaints – about a company making a profit on public safety – and the SEC. In addition, the Washington Post reported that a new Facebook whistleblower, a former employee like Haugen, had sent an affidavit to the SEC making the same allegations.
Facebook, which is preparing to announce the company’s name change, has been backing down from all reports. The company denied that it valued profits beyond public safety, emphasized the effectiveness of its protections, and claimed that the leaked documents presented a negative, negative view of the company’s internal operations. Below, there are details of the latest revelations from the leaked Facebook pages.
An existing problem youth is facing from Facebook
Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced Monday that the company will undergo a long-term “redesign” to make younger users involved in the “north star.” As Verge colleague Alex Heath explains, the leaked documents contain details of why:
To make matters worse, the younger the user, the less likely they were to regularly associate with the app. The message was clear: Facebook was rapidly losing popularity with younger generations. “The story of old age is a reality,” the researcher wrote in an internal invitation. They predict that, if “too few teens choose Facebook as they grow older,” the company will face a “worse” decline in new users than previously thought.
And young adults do not like Facebook:
“Many young adults view Facebook as a 40- and 50-year-old community,” according to [a March presentation to the company’s chief product manager, Chris Cox.] They often have to go through unimportant content to reach what is important. “It added that” they have a lot of bad relationships with Facebook including concerns about privacy, the impact on their well-being, and low awareness of the right services. “
A March presentation to Cox showed that, in the US, “youth purchases are down and continue to decline.” Account registration for users under the age of 18 has dropped by 26 percent since last year in the top five countries of the app. Already on Facebook, the company has continued to “see lower or worse levels of engagement compared to older groups.” Messages sent to teenagers have dropped by 16 percent since last year, while messages sent to users aged 20–30 were lower.
Heath notes that there are warning signs on Instagram, and:
Instagram was doing better with young people, with full crowds in the US, France, UK, Japan, and Australia. But there was still reason for concern. Youth exports have dropped by 13 percent since 2020 and are “still the most significant trend,” say, researchers, adding that increased use of TikTok by young people means that we are “likely to lose our all-time allocation.”
The company also estimated that teens spend two to three times more time on TikTok than on Instagram.
Facebook has not attacked some of its most toxic and cold-blooded users. Some people who use multiple Facebook accounts (a company that calls them One User for Multiple Accounts or SUMA) are responsible for many divisive and harmful content on Facebook. But as Politico reports, leaked documents show the company failed to fix the problem after identifying it:
An important [SUMA] segment spreads so many divisive political positions that it has become a major source of toxic politics for the forum, in line with internal company documents and interviews with former employees.
While many SUMAs are harmless, Facebook employees for many years have branded as many accounts as those who clean up dangerous political activities. However, the company has failed to fight SUMA in any way, the documents say. That even though using multiple accounts violates Facebook’s Community Guidelines.
The company’s March 2018 survey said that SUMA accounts reach up to 11 million viewers daily or about 14 percent of the U.S. political population. During the week of March 4, 2018, 1.6 million SUMA accounts made political posts accessible to U.S. users.
Facebook rules have been broken
Facebook software thought Trump had broken the rules, but people broke it more. According to those internal documents that are leaked from Facebook. T
rump’s other comments on social media came on May 28, 2020, when he issued a warning to protesters against the assassination of George Floyd in Minneapolis that “when a robbery starts shooting!” The AP reports that the Facebook algorithm has determined with almost most of the certainty that the president has violated its rules. But Trump’s post, as well as his account, has not stopped, as the company has found that things began to deteriorate rapidly on Facebook shortly after his message:
Internal analysis shows a fivefold increase in reports of violence on Facebook, while hate speech complaints tripled in the days following Trump’s post. Reports of false news were increased. The re-sharing of Trump’s message has produced “a huge amount of hate speech and violence,” many of which Facebook has worked to remove. Some of those comments include calls “first to shoot these criminals” and “f– the white.”
On May 29, CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote on his Facebook page that Trump did not violate Facebook policies, because he did not “cause the immediate risk of certain injuries or risks specified in the explicit policies.” The company told the AP that its software was not always up to date and that people were honest judges.
Politics tends to inform internal decisions
The Wall Street Journal notes that there has been an internal controversy over the use of Facebook on the right and that political considerations are high among company executives:
Documents reviewed by the Journal did not rule out bias affecting its general decisions. They show that employees and their managers are fiercely arguing over how to block right-wing publishers and how, and top executives often provide a check-up from the level and file. Documents viewed by the Journal, which do not cover all staff messages, do not state the same arguments regarding the left publication.
Other documents also reveal that the Facebook management team was so focused on avoiding bias cases that it always put political views in the middle of decision-making.